Blogs

Search Blogs
Search by date
Choose From Date
Choose To Date
SearchClear

Broker-Dealer Dodges Michigan Nexus

The Michigan Supreme Court recently reversed an odd Michigan Court of Appeals decision, which held that an out-of-state securities broker-dealer had nexus sufficient to subject it to the Single Business Tax (SBT) by virtue of the activities of in-stat

August 17, 2011

The Michigan Supreme Court recently reversed an odd Michigan Court of Appeals decision, which held that an out-of-state securities broker-dealer had nexus sufficient to subject it to the Single Business Tax (SBT) by virtue of the activities of in-state, independent registered representatives who contracted with the broker-dealer to facilitate trades for the representatives’ customers on out-of-state security exchanges. Vestax Sec. Corp. v. Dep’t of Treasury, 2011 Mich. LEXIS 945 (June 1, 2011), rev’g, 2010 Mich. App. LEXIS 2093 (Oct. 28, 2010).   

Vestax Securities Corporation, an out-of-state securities broker-dealer company, had contractual relationships with independent registered representatives who used Vestax to facilitate securities transactions. These independent representatives had in-state customers who would request a securities trade from the representative, and the representative, in turn, would rely on Vestax to execute the transaction on a national securities exchange outside of Michigan.

The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the in-state physical presence of the representatives in Michigan was on behalf of Vestax and created in-state business for Vestax, resulting in substantial nexus sufficient under the Commerce Clause for SBT purposes. The appellate court noted at the outset that constitutional “substantial nexus” is met when a taxpayer’s in-state physical presence is more than a “slightest presence,” manifested by the presence of “property or conduct of economic activities in the taxing State performed by the vendor’s personnel or on its behalf.” The court reasoned that the representatives conducted business in Michigan on behalf of the taxpayer as its agents because they were required to use Vestax in order to process their customers’ securities transactions.

The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the appellate court’s judgment on the grounds that the evidentiary record did not support the determination that the representatives were Vestax’s agents or that there was a substantial nexus between Michigan and Vestax’s business activity.

Our Story

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP is an international law firm helping the Fortune 100, industry leaders, sector innovators and business entrepreneurs solve their biggest challenges and reach their business goals. Dedicated to unfaltering excellence in client service, we are known for our business savvy and industry intelligence, providing creative and custom solutions for each of our clients. Industry and business experience makes the difference for our clients.

click to watch Videocast: Sutherland SALT Scoreboard – 2nd Quarter Highlights
Videocast: Sutherland SALT Scoreboard – 2nd Quarter Highlights
Washington, DC
Elizabeth S. Cha, Associate
Washington, DC
© 2016 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP / Sutherland (Europe) LLP
MYBRIEFCASE
Add this page to MYBRIEFCASE
Add Page to MYBRIEFCASE
News/Commentary - Broker-Dealer Dodges Michigan Nexus
Current MYBRIEFCASE Pages
Save ChangesDownload MYBRIEFCASEClear All