Blogs

Search Blogs
Search by date
Choose From Date
Choose To Date
SearchClear

De-Combining Hoosiers

The Indiana Tax Court held that the Indiana Department of Revenue could not require Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (RAC East) to file a combined return with two of its affiliates.

The Indiana Tax Court held that the Indiana Department of Revenue could not require Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (RAC East) to file a combined return with two of its affiliates. Rent-A-Center East, Inc. v. Indiana Dep’t of Rev., 49T10-0612-TA-106 (May 27, 2011). Generally, Indiana requires corporations to file income tax returns on a separate entity basis. Indiana, however, permits the Department of Revenue to require entities to file a combined report if: 

  1. Indiana’s standard apportionment provisions do not fairly reflect a taxpayer’s income derived from sources within Indiana; and 
  2. The Department is unable to effectuate an equitable apportionment of the taxpayer’s gross income by any other method.

RAC East filed its 2003 Indiana income tax return on a separate entity basis and owed no income tax based on this filing methodology. RAC East paid royalties on an arm’s-length basis to RAC West, the entity that owned the trademarks and trade names associated with the Rent-A-Center brand, and paid management fees to RAC Texas. The Indiana Department determined that RAC East was required to file on a combined basis with RAC West and RAC Texas, assessing $513,273, including interest and penalties.

The Indiana Tax Court determined that the Department failed to provide any facts substantiating that the application of combined reporting was appropriate. An Indiana regulation specifically provides that the Department may not require a combined report “unless the department is unable to fairly reflect the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income through use of” alternative apportionment or an adjustment of income between related entities. The Department stated that it considered disallowing RAC East’s expense deductions to RAC West and RAC Texas, but that computation would nearly double RAC East’s tax liability. The Indiana Tax Court held that the Department’s argument was nothing more than a hypothetical and not a valid attempt to adjust the taxpayer’s income without the use of a combined report.

Our Story

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP is an international law firm helping the Fortune 100, industry leaders, sector innovators and business entrepreneurs solve their biggest challenges and reach their business goals. Dedicated to unfaltering excellence in client service, we are known for our business savvy and industry intelligence, providing creative and custom solutions for each of our clients. Industry and business experience makes the difference for our clients.

click to watch Videocast: Sutherland SALT Scoreboard – 2nd Quarter Highlights
Videocast: Sutherland SALT Scoreboard – 2nd Quarter Highlights
Washington, DC
Elizabeth S. Cha, Associate
Washington, DC
© 2016 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP / Sutherland (Europe) LLP
MYBRIEFCASE
Add this page to MYBRIEFCASE
Add Page to MYBRIEFCASE
News/Commentary - De-Combining Hoosiers
Current MYBRIEFCASE Pages
Save ChangesDownload MYBRIEFCASEClear All