Search Blogs
Search by date
Choose From Date
Choose To Date

Massachusetts Shams a Holding Company

In IDC Research, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue, No. 09-P-1533 (Nov. 30, 2010), the Appeals Court of Massachusetts held that

December 3, 2010

In IDC Research, Inc. v. Comm’r of Revenue, No. 09-P-1533 (Nov. 30, 2010), the Appeals Court of Massachusetts held that the transfer of International Data Group’s (IDG) logo licensing business to a Delaware subsidiary was a sham. The court affirmed the Appellate Tax Board’s decision and reallocated the Delaware subsidiary’s royalty income from foreign affiliates to IDG. 

The court found that IDG never actually transferred ownership of the logo licensing business because it:

  1. Failed to adhere to multiple corporate formalities; 
  2. Continued to identify itself as the owner of the logo; 
  3. Continued to treat the logo as its own after the transfer; and 
  4. Retained the benefits and burdens of ownership – as evidenced by its withdrawal of millions of dollars from the Delaware subsidiary’s account.

IDG asserted that the withdrawals were loans; however, there was no loan documentation and minimal repayment to the subsidiary. While IDG claimed that its business purpose for the structure was decentralization, the court held this was inconsistent with IDG’s retention of control over the subsidiary and the logo. 

In addition to the lack of business purpose, the court found that the Delaware subsidiary lacked economic substance. Its only activities consisted of the receipt of royalty income, the automatic investment of such income, and the leasing of office space in Delaware for $250 a month. Furthermore, all of the Delaware subsidiary’s licensing agreements were with affiliated entities. Finally,  the court agreed with the Appellate Tax Board’s conclusion that the Delaware subsidiary was a “passive vessel” used to divert royalty income from IDG.

Our Story

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP is an international law firm helping the Fortune 100, industry leaders, sector innovators and business entrepreneurs solve their biggest challenges and reach their business goals. Dedicated to unfaltering excellence in client service, we are known for our business savvy and industry intelligence, providing creative and custom solutions for each of our clients. Industry and business experience makes the difference for our clients.

click to watch Videocast: DOL Fiduciary Rule Litigation Impacts
Videocast: DOL Fiduciary Rule Litigation Impacts
Atlanta, GA
Washington, DC
© 2017 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP / Sutherland (Europe) LLP
Add this page to MYBRIEFCASE
News/Commentary - Massachusetts Shams a Holding Company
Save ChangesDownload MYBRIEFCASEClear All