Blogs

Search Blogs
Search by date
Choose From Date
Choose To Date
SearchClear

NYT Editorial Says Public Debate on Broadwater Is Crucial to Review Process

A New York Times editorial  published yesterday says the ongoing public discourse on the potential benefits and pitfalls of the proposed Broadwater LNG terminal is necessary. The paper says that while both sides have valid arguments, the company has yet
February 5, 2006

A New York Times editorial  published yesterday says the ongoing public discourse on the potential benefits and pitfalls of the proposed Broadwater LNG terminal is necessary. The paper says that while both sides have valid arguments, the company has yet to prove that the project would benefit Long Island. “A healthy skepticism cuts both ways, and we look forward to hearing the best arguments of those who would lead us down another path.” The editorial also recognizes that LNG “can be a reasonable step toward a saner future.” [Free registration necessary]

Our Story

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP is an international law firm helping the Fortune 100, industry leaders, sector innovators and business entrepreneurs solve their biggest challenges and reach their business goals. Dedicated to unfaltering excellence in client service, we are known for our business savvy and industry intelligence, providing creative and custom solutions for each of our clients. Industry and business experience makes the difference for our clients.

click to watch Videocast: DOL Fiduciary Rule Litigation Impacts
Videocast: DOL Fiduciary Rule Litigation Impacts
Atlanta, GA
Washington, DC
© 2016 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP / Sutherland (Europe) LLP
MYBRIEFCASE
Add this page to MYBRIEFCASE
Add Page to MYBRIEFCASE
News/Commentary - NYT Editorial Says Public Debate on Broadwater Is Crucial to Review Process
Current MYBRIEFCASE Pages
Save ChangesDownload MYBRIEFCASEClear All